Welcome, Guest. Please Login
Anotherealm BBS
Click the logo above to go back to the main site.
 
  HomeHelpSearchLogin  
 
You do have to register to post but you will be a better person for it.

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
What Ails the Short Story - essay NY Times (Read 448 times)
Webbie
YaBB Administrator
Sponsor
Front Page Author
*****
Offline

I love AR

Posts: 932
Anotherealm
Gender: male
What Ails the Short Story - essay NY Times
Feb 08th, 2014, 4:09am
 
The American short story is alive and well.
Do you like the sound of that? Me too. I only wish it were actually true. The art form is still alive — that I can testify to. As editor of “The Best American Short Stories 2007,” I read hundreds of them, and a great many were good stories. Some were very good. And some seemed to touch greatness. But “well”? That’s a different story.

Read more here
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/books/review/King2-t.html

Which brings up the question, what do you think is going on with storytelling in general?
Back to top
 
 

-W
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Jeangoldstrom
Senior Member
Sponsor
Front Page Author
****
Offline

I Love AR

Posts: 341

Re: What Ails the Short Story - essay NY Times
Reply #1 - Feb 9th, 2014, 7:17pm
 
Thanks for the link, Webbie. Interesting essay.

I picked up a recent Best American Short Stories book in my favorite second hand store. Oh boy, I thought! Here comes some good reading...but alas.

I quit reading after the fifth story. The first four were Pity Poot Me The Misunderstood Hero. The fifth was about...something else, I forget what. I could not get up my interest to continue further.

King is right in his theory that short fiction is pretty much in the dumper. (Whortleberry Press stories excepted, of course.) But to back off and try to take in a larger horizon -- the world we know is changing fast.

Printed fiction has been popular for about 300 years. That is not much more than a tick in the clock of human history. Our world has changed profoundly in the past 300 years. Think of the changes in that time. For example, 300 years ago, relatively few people _could_ read.

Pulp fiction was the favored entertainment of a mass audience -- when those pulp mags cost a dime -- or less. King's choice of reading material at $80-some dollars is not a choice all of us are able to make.

So, I will go read some fun stuff on the Net -- maybe even an Anotherealm.com story. I can afford that. So can a lot of people.

IMO we have to face the fact that writing fiction is no longer a full time work activity. And that's not a bad thing. It just means the field will shrink -- or grow -- to commodate only those who really want to do it.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print